Remembering: 2009
Encore, encore! Now that 2009 has officially ended and we've spent a day... recuperating, I have to finish off all those series I started that necessarily paused after 2008. I hate to say it'll be a dog's age before I'm posting with the same frequency I did in December, but here's dessert.
Jan 12, AMC 600 Michigan Ave, Chicago, IL
If we don't count W., given its very different agenda, I am pretty sure that Notorious represented my first chance to see a biopic made about someone about whom I had immediate, regular impressions from the moment he first rose to prominence. Much more than that, B.I.G. was someone I admired hugely as an artist, a wordsmith, and, you know, as an indispensable party starter in college. When "Hypnotize" blasted anywhere near a dance floor or a dorm room, I was instantly right in the middle of that, and "Juicy" was a pretty regular playlist jam in grad school. So, I was a hugely excited opening-day audience member for this movie, which unfortunately turned out to be unnecessarily pedestrian, though I completely loved how the movie handled the Lil' Kim arc (that "Get Money" scene is a scorcher), and the chance to hear all those songs pounding through a cinema sound-system was not to be missed. I believe I have made mention before of the AMC 600 Michigan Ave implicitly targeting an audience of black Chicagoans, for which you could read, how AMC600 attempts a kind of de facto segregation of the nearby (and, you'll never guess this, nicer, bigger, and better-maintained) AMC River East. So here's me, a white patron, having a whole conversation with the black ticket-taker where we air our shared impressions of how AMC orchestrates this racial cordoning of their imagined audience. He was telling me about all the black folks who'd been buying advance tickets for opening day for almost a week, once it became clear that the River East wasn't even booking Notorious on any of its 21 screens, despite its emergence, to no one's surprise, as by far the hugest-grossing movie of that weekend. This guy and I were getting along so well. At the end of this chat, he goes, "So, anyway, what are you here to see?" I thought this had been the premise of our whole conversation. I said, "Notorious!" He gave me a quizzical look, and said, "Really?" And I achieved what alcoholics and Jheri-curled contract killers sometimes refer to as a Moment of Clarity, and reckoned with how deeply, deeply uncool I obviously look.
Jan 21, AMC River East 21, Chicago, IL
Maybe I am deeply uncool, because I loved Last Chance Harvey, which was all but thrown away by the admittedly cash-strapped Overture Films, and was never even marketed to anyone who doesn't have personal memories of the LBJ administration, if not Eisenhower's. Mike and I sat in the front row of the main bank of seats; not the ones where you have to look up at such a precipitous angle that it feels like you're blasting off in a rocket, but further back, where you can put your feet on the rail. We loved Harvey, all the more so for the fact that neither of us had expected anything of it. Mike wrote this dear blog entry about the focus-pulling. The focus-pulling! For my part, if you performed a chemical breakdown of my brain, you'd find that at least 25% of it is made up of Middle-Aged Woman, but even without that particular disposition, and even if I hadn't learned an awful lot about divorce and middle-aged regrets from only one degree of separation in recent years, I still think I would have admired the acting of Thompson, of Hoffman, and of Liane Balaban as Hoffman's daughter, as well as the simple but truthful storytelling. This is why I go to ten or fifteen movies a year that have little on the surface to recommend them except someone or other is trying to push them as awards contenders. Most of them are as bad as you're guessing or worse. But then you hit a gem.
Jan 23, Block Cinema, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL
Kenneth Anger's complete Magick Lantern Cycle, starting with Fireworks, on the big screen? Yes, please! You don't pass up an opportunity like that, especially if it means watching a room that is mostly full of college students getting their first look at a legendary short film from 1947 that is candidly about the bloody, sadomasochistic, homoerotic fantasies of a bunch of hunky sailors. Unless the oneiric signals are red herrings and most of this is "actually" happening to the character, give or take having the pulpy cavity around his heart get cut open and probed by an especially avid seducer-tormenter, only to discover that inside his ticker is an actual timepiece. You can see the whole, lurid, vivid piece here and here, but not on projected 16mm, and not with all of Anger's other shorts immediately following, though I unfortunately had to duck out after the third one. Still, a delirious night at the campus rep house.
Feb 12, Bank of America Cinema, Chicago, IL
More virtues of Mike's repertory theater: access to The Goddess, which would otherwise be very hard to come by. All the "Female Brando" hype around Kim Stanley is impossible not to want to know more about, but she only made five movies, and I'm saving Séance on a Wet Afternoon for very near the end of my Best Actress Project. The Goddess was her first movie, and you'll be able to knock me over with a feather if it isn't also her strangest. I took pages of notes watching it from Mike's projection booth, none of which I have done anything with, and there's always the question of how much I'll even be able to decipher from them at this point. But it's a compellingly strange story, another nail in the coffin of the 1950s' ballyhooed "innocence" and "return to normalcy," and, if not quite what I would call a good movie, a completely interesting misfire. I'll be back at Mike's tonight for Pandora's Box with live organ, and hopefully for more of his stellar lineup for early 2010.
Apr 20, Regal Green Hills Cinema, Nashville, TN
As I've already suggested twice, I would probably have flipped for Kimberly Reed's Prodigal Sons in any context, but experiencing her transfixingly honest and incredibly assured documentary with a chance to hear from her and her producer directly afterward at the Nashville Film Festival was especially extraordinary. The audience had just as many questions about gender and sexual identity as about mental illness and relationship maintenance, and just as much for the future of Kim's film as for the stamina of her family. You'll know why when you see the movie, but she was funny, candid, and charismatic in all of her answers. Though I'd never done anything like this before, I approached her immediately after about coming to Northwestern for a presentation of Prodigal Sons to my Queer Cinema class and the Gender Studies Program, and I'm happy to say that in less than a month she and her movie will be here in Evanston. Already one of the looming highlights of my new year... though my own enthusiasm can't have mattered a whit compared to that of Nicole Kidman, who saw either the screening before or the one after the one I attended with an equally impressed Nathaniel R., but whichever one it was, Nicole apparently spotted Kim after, while on her way to the bathroom, and gave her a big, admiring hug.
May 23, AMC Pipers Alley 4, Chicago, IL
When you're lucky, great filmgoing experiences bloom out of movies you're pretty sure you don't even want to see. Admitting the sizable handicap enforced by the fact that I've skipped all of his 1980s career-makers, I just don't get on that often with Jim Jarmusch. And I don't know if there's a single English-language director whose way of talking about his or her films does more harm to my interest in actually seeing them. If it weren't for Ghost Dog (more here), I'd have quit long ago, Tilda or no Tilda. But I had friends who wanted to see The Limits of Control, plus I had read that as a barely-narrative experience of image and sound it rather packed a punch, and I'm always intrigued when a movie I expect to fly in and out of Chicago in a week or two manages to hold on for three or four. So, I went in a group of three, feeling a bit abashed throughout that I was absolutely loving a movie that is so obviously not outfitted to be anybody's cup of tea. Turned out all three of us were feeling the same, mostly concealed enthusiasm: those circles and diagonals! Those colors and angles! The dry, dry humor! I know a lot of folks who are in profound sympathy with the Cannes board's decision to decline Limits of Control a spot anywhere in the festival. I'll want to write about the movie later when I've been through it a second time, but if you're a fan looking for a band of sympathetic comrades, head over to Tim Brayton's great write-up.
Jul 20, Gene Siskel Film Center, Chicago, IL
Communicating volume and vehemence can be tough in print without just getting typographically annoying. But WHY isn't Steven Soderbergh's King of the Hill on DVD yet? And why did barely anyone notice it in 1993, even though everyone I know who has seen it thinks it's a perfectly scaled, deeply felt, refreshingly unprecious film about childhood? As in, not that far from 400 Blows terrain, if you ask me. Why didn't the subsequent explosion of Soderbergh's career, the future "arrivals" of Jesse Bradford, Adrien Brody, and Katherine Heigl, or the curio value of Lauryn Hill as an elevator operator ever convince someone to at least clean the print? Why is Criterion about to drop a deluxe version of Che instead of this? Some questions cannot be answered, but after hauling two dear friends to the Siskel to see this in an extremely rare theatrical exhibition, I at least hoped the movie was as strong as I had described it while selling them on the outing. The verdict: just as good, if not better. Two instant converts and one reconfirmed devotee.
Sep 3, Facets Cinemathèque, Chicago, IL
I'm probably not doing myself any favors by admitting what a harpy and a hypocrite I can be, but I often lay guilt onto local Chicagoan film fans and students who tell me they've never been to Facets Cinemathèque, and yet I've only attended about a half-dozen screenings there in three and a half years, despite having a resounding success on every occasion I recall. This was never truer than with Roy Andersson's You, the Living. It is quite possible that Songs from the Second Floor, Andersson's debut, is just as puckish, innovative, and haunting, but I have to admit, despite liking the film when it belatedly arrived to the States in 2002, no more than one or two images have survived with me. You, the Living was instantly more indelible, and even if that comes down to my being more receptive at 32 than at 25 to this kind of wry, meticulous, bleak, but weirdly jovial static-humor minimalism, I knew I was having one of the most special experiences I'd have all year in a cinema. Hopefully Andersson's next film is coming along nicely, and it won't have to withstand the same two-year hold in the imaginary customs-house of U.S. distribution that slowed this one and Songs so irritatingly after they made such splashes at major world festivals. (I saw this one with Mike, too, so after Harvey, Goddess, and this, he really starts to look like the Angel of Good Fortune in terms of my last year of ticket-buying. Anything he suggests in the near future, I'm going.)
Sep 25, CinéArts 18, Evanston, IL
My Jane! Just seeing the credit "A Film by Jane Campion" shimmering up there on a huge silver screen was like making contact with a long-lost relation or a deeply missed friend. Bright Star very quickly showed itself to be gorgeous, and with the accumulation of chuckly throwaways, precocious yet watchful performances from children, hilarious cameos by our four-legged friends, and the very first triple-pleated mushroom collar that anyone had rocked in Fanny's hometown, I knew I was back on home turf. Such a lovely experience. Too many scenes, maybe, of Schneider's character serving a rather broad structural purpose in the narrative. Lots of scenes of "Is Mister Keats in? No?" and maybe a bit more self-consciously picturesque than is always beneficial, but I still treasure the film. I went with a new friend who happens to be a scholar of Romantic literature, and though she was watching from a very different perspective, snagging on details like Ben Whishaw reciting the words "for ever" as though what Keats wrote was the adverb "forever," she enjoyed it, too, despite some blanket departures from fact. A bonus point since this screening, despite so obviously catering to a crowd of 19th-century period-film enthusiasts, is where I made first contact with the uproarious moment in the Young Victoria trailer where the voiceover narrator helpfully intones, "Based on the true story..." As auditors of Nathaniel's podcast already know, I did not then and have not afterward been able to hear or even remember that line without busting a gut. It's just too funny! I hope Spielberg's Abraham Lincoln movie is also eventually advertised as "Based on a true story."
Oct 3, AMC River East 21, Chicago, IL
At risk of repeating myself, I'll refer you back to my morning-after report about seeing Paranormal Activity in one of its extremely limited-release, guerrilla-marketed midnight screenings on its way to a national release and a hugely laudable $100 million gross. I'm so happy that I saw it when I knew nothing about it, when its considerable scares hadn't remotely been spoiled for me, and when I could root for it as a commercial underdog, once I was finally over the problem of getting scared even while writing about the movie. Probably the single moment in 2009 when I felt most excited to be in a jam-packed cinemawhich, given my incorrigible affinity for afternoon matinées, is a pretty rare occurrence for me anywayand to be in the hands of a filmmaker, a marketing team, and a distributing studio who had clearly thought about how to exploit the environmental and epistemic experience of a movie theater to their fullest extent, and to the clear advantage of the movie. Also, this remains the only movie of last year that terrorized me so thoroughly that I shrieked in the face of the first person I encountered afterward. I know you'd think expect that The Blind Side might have prompted some kind of repeat, but it didn't.
Oct 10, AMC River East 21, Chicago, IL
You know when you're watching a legitimately strange movie when you're thinking as early as the first ten minutes, "Who would even make this?" That's where Raging Sun, Raging Sky got me, though in a transfixed and giddily sympathetic way, as some kind of semi-real, Mestizo-looking gal shuffled around the highways, medians, bus stops, and grassy knolls of Mexico City, tormented by overhearing the thoughts and mutterings of every other person around her. And then it started raining voluminously, and then she met a teenage boy, and then she followed him home and boinked him, and then she evaporated into thin air, and then a whole bunch of steel-gazed, hard-bodied, male cinema patrons and security guards started circling each other in a range of alternately mundane, sweet, and debased situations, having or trying to have or telepathically promising to have a whole lot of sex. I've gotten you about thirty or forty minutes into the scenario of this three-hour movie. We're nowhere close to the sudden blackout, the sudden dessication of all the water in the world, and the sudden coming-to-consciousness of the same characters, or maybe different characters played by different actors, in extreme long-shots of some kind of sun-bleached, granite-heavy prehistory of the world as we know it, visited by Aztec priestesses as well as scaly, half-human captors as well as a buff, nude Perseus of Central America. I totally went for it, as its inclusion on my Best 100 Films of the 00s list will indicate... either because of or despite the fact that a good two-thirds of the sold-out audience walked out, most of them well past the midpoint of the film. Maybe, if Raging Sun, Raging Sky ever becomes possible to see again, I'll conclude that Hernández has made a softcore gay adaptation of an Earth, Wind, and Fire album cover, but his audacity was absolutely thrilling and, to me, buttressed by considerable formal control and persistence of purpose. As the credits rolled, I gave a caustic evil-eye to the old couple down the row, who had loudly lampooned the movie through its last 90 minutes and then wanted to talk to me afterward about all the notes I was scribbling down. But I left it at the hard, disapproving stare. I did not call them out as nasty cynical crows!, cheeching lemurs of near-deafness!, chattering vultures of the apocalypse! So I thought I behaved rather well.
Oct 17, AMC River East 21, Chicago, IL
Another lovely way to experience a film festival is to lap up a strong piece of work as it plays to its most appreciative, studio-starved crowd, and to do so before an unexpected haul of festival awards suddenly makes the movie interesting to everyone else. This was my experience with Tina Mabry's Mississippi Damned, which tries and mostly succeeds as a multi-character, lump-in-her-throat fictionalization of the filmmaker's own past, spent amidst her large family of low-income African Americans, all of them trying just as hard to clear their psychological hang-ups and hurdles as the material obstacles and social contexts that are clearly aligned against them. The film is not the most stylistically innovative you will ever see, and the sort of viewer who sometimes complains, "How could all of this happen to one family?" might push back at Mississippi Damned, notwithstanding Mabry's assurance that she is barely embellishing the details of her own domestic record. The script, especially as buoyed by some excellent ensemble performances, extends an illuminating sympathy to some wrenching betrayals of self and of others that transpire over the film. Mabry's own appealing, low-key cheerfulness and her belief in her work made for a wonderful tonic after such a rueful picture, and I was so glad to watch it in the row just in front of her invited family, co-workers, and friends, who were beaming with tangible pride throughout, no matter how many closets the film rustles through in search of barely-concealed skeletons. Please keep an eye out for theatrical distribution; it won three prizes from the festival jury, including the Golden Hugo for the best narrative feature.
Oct 21, AMC River East 21, Chicago, IL
The Silver Hugo, i.e., the runner-up choice for Best Picture out of 145 films, went to Andrea Arnold's Fish Tank, which also scored the Best Director and Best Supporting Actor citations. I'll have more to say about Fish Tank in the coming year, and if Michael Fassbender can't fight his way to a Best Supporting Actor nomination at the 2010 Oscars, then the system is even more broken than we already know it is. Still, I should admit that part of my lingering affection for the memory of this screening has to do with a rare moment of theological frisson. I forsook my already-purchased ticket to the one scheduled screening of Fish Tank I could attend, because I felt bad about all the work I wasn't getting done during the Festival, but then I was glum for almost a week, regretting having taken the professional high road. "Are you there, God? It's me, Margaret!" I prayed. "Please let Fish Tank win one of the top prizes, so that I can attend some kind of Encore screening!" Does the fact that this in fact transpired, to an absolute tee, mean that I have to start wavering even further in my agnosticism?
Nov 22, Gene Siskel Film Center, Chicago, IL
Derek and I flew my mother out from Washington, DC, to Chicago for an entire week at Thanksgiving, during which we enjoyed making a huge deal of her, introducing her to friends, touring her around our workplaces, and cooking her a big dinner. A much earlier riser than either of us, Mom caught me absolutely unawares with her previously latent actressexuality. She was sleeping in the room with the DVDs and the television, and spent some sunrise hours watching Away from Her, La Vie en rose, Rachel Getting Married, The Talk of the Town, The Double Life of Véronique, The Savages, The Diving Bell and the Butterfly, and, twice, Russian Ark. Not a lot of happy pills in there, though she reports that Rachel was the saddest, because "most of the others were about problems that can't be prevented, but if parents are so screwed-up and self-absorbed that they kind of doom their kids to having that many complexes, then that's even worse. Though I still would have boxed Kym's ears. Many times." So, there's a little piece of Mom. The needed counter-balance of levity came with my surprising her with tickets to a Siskel screening of The Muppet Movie, almost exactly thirty years after she first took me. Expecting a room full of garrulous pups, we discovered that almost everyone in the crowded theater was between her age and mine, and all of us were acting like we were in heaven. If George Clooney or Woody Harrelson or one of their characters ever had to deliver some heart-splitting piece of news to me, I would recommend in advance that they follow it up quickly with a snapshot of Kermit the Frog riding his bicycle, or strumming his banjo on his lily pad, and against all odds, I expect that some part of me would feel a little bit better right away.
Nov 28, Landmark Century City Cinemas, Chicago, IL
As we know, and as I've recently and loudly complained, November and December often prompt a kind of forced march through a series of movies that you half want to see, don't want to see, are disappointed at disliking, or expect to dislike from the get-go, but you're drawn in by the promise of some standout element that other folks have praised. Scheduling can become a bear, if you don't get invitations to pre-coordinated press screenings, so I often wind up piling on the double- and triple-features, even when it means the entire rest of the week or weekend is spent on work, in order to compensate for such dubious gluttony. The day I went to Landmark and watched Fantastic Mr. Fox, Coco Before Chanel, and The Bad Lieutenant: Port of Call: New Orleans back to back to back was emblematic of how at least a couple of days wind up going at this time every year. I wish I had more to show for it than the admittedly great confrontation where Mrs. Fox tells her husband that she loves him but never should have married him, the strong Benoît Poelvoorde performance in Coco and a better-than-expected outing from Audrey Tautou, and the choice but concentrated moments when Bad Lieutenant is as derangedly inspired as I had wanted the whole movie to feel: the breakdance, the iguanas, the line about a "shit-turd" (?), the two accostings outside the same dance club, and a couple of the scenes with Coolidge. Otherwise, the sheer fact of breathing in such a cacophonous triple-feature turned out to be a bit more fun than any of the movies achieved on their own terms. I do love a solidly schizophrenic line-up.
Dec 29, Showplace Icon Theatre, Chicago, IL
And we end with Sherlock Holmes, not, as you know, because I have anything nice to say about that aggressively flippant, poorly executed, and insensible cash-grab but because it at least meant ending the year in a whole new kind of cinema experience. The Kerasotes chain, which I think is Chicago's second-largest after AMC, recently cut the ribbon on a new complex called the Showplace Icon, where for five extra dollars, you get seated in a balcony with a superior sight line, where no one under 21 is allowed to sit, and no one is permitted to enter after the film has started. You also have convenient access to a full cocktail bar and a menu of paninis, gourmet pizzas, meat-and-chase plates, and fresh bits of cooked bacon for your stovetop-roasted popcorn. This all had a rather spurious air of sitting in a Rose DeWitt Bukater cabin of the Titanic, even as the economy of commercial film exhibition, not to mention every other economy, continues to sink. But even if you pay the Jack Dawson price and sit in the main section, you're guaranteed an all-digital projection (which I have to admit, I don't think I want) and absolutely no ads except the trailers for other movies. Since Derek and I didn't really do anything for Christmas, having already gone whole-hog at Thanksgiving, we had the cash to attempt this indulgence. I don't know whether it signals a new horizon for how studios and theater chains will try to recuperate the dwindling experience of in-cinema projection or if it's just a gross emblem of the mass public fetishizing ludicrous amenities at a time when we should all be saving nickels and worrying about any and all infractions of a sustainable economy of scale. Either way, it felt to me like more of a paradigm-shift than being able to see all the way to the back of a passenger shuttle in Avatar. Now we all hang in there to see what comes next, on the screen as well as around the screen, or (gulp) instead of the screen.
Key VHS/DVD Encounters from 2009 (Chronological):
The Mourning Forest, The Flame of New Orleans, Here Comes Mr. Jordan, Flaming Creatures, Band of Outsiders, The Shanghai Gesture, Meet John Doe, The Battle of Midway, Bambi, This Gun for Hire, Holiday Inn, Saboteur, Silverlake Life: The View from Here, The Life and Death of 9413, a Hollywood Extra, I Am So Proud of You, Love You More, Next Floor, In the Year of the Pig, Daughter from Danang, La Ciénaga, The Times of Harvey Milk, Werckmeister Harmonies, A Time for Drunken Horses, Stereo, Eureka, Corner in Wheat, Slacker, Raise the Red Lantern, Duplicity, My Neighbor, My Killer, The Maid, Open Water 2: Adrift, The Sun, Anvil! The Story of Anvil, and A Prophet
Labels: End of 00s
13 Comments:
Bright Star remains for me the most stand-out experience in a theatre this year. It was at the Civic, which is Auckland's local BIG theatre with about 2500 seats. I got there late, due to bad traffic, but managed to catch the guy opening the New Zealand Film Festival. Me and my comrade were also dressed in your standard teenage garb; shirt and jeans among these stately-dressed people waiting for a Jane Campion film to screen.
I watched it completely smitten with Campion again, not that I ever slacked; it may not be my favourite film of this year, but it's the one I'm most keen to revisit, especially Abbie Cornish's vivid, strong, not-at-all-stately-period, performance. I remember this one shot of her in the middle of the woods, facing off with Schneider and Whishaw, and she looks so wounded and just ANGRY. It's rare to see anger and blood in a period film like this.
Sadly, I also remember jumping and skipping from the theatre declaring it would be nominated for all the awards. Sigh.
very OT.
but I've just seen Cousin, Cousine (1976) and it confirmed my expectations. Marie-Christine Barrault's nomination has got to be the biggest shock this category's ever had, nomination wise. So unexpected...
http://mylatestoscarfilm.blogspot.com/2010/01/cousin-cousine-1975.html
And getting back to 2009: how come you haven't seen The Lovely Bones yet? :)
@Alex: The studio is freaking out about the movie's reviews and low box-office in LA and NYC, so it hasn't even arrived in Chicago yet. I'll be there when it shows up, though it seems wise to expect the worst.
Okay, Nick: if you're ever in combat, you've got a trench buddy in me just for that MUPPET MOVIE writeup. (That's always been my litmus-test flick, and I'm tickled pink that the National Registry recognized it this year.)
And THE LIMITS OF CONTROL is one that keeps burrowing itself deeper and deeper into my soul. "I used my imagination" might be maybe my favourite movie-moment of the year.
The main reason I am commenting isn't because I have anything productive to contribute but because I just realised I've forgotten to mention how much I've been enjoying this series.
Since I'm already posting though, I'll mention that what underwhelmed me about Cornish in Bright Star was precisely the fact that she wasn't stately enough. I understand that she is a free soul at a time where they were a rarity but I got tired very quickly of her asserting her headstrongness in every scene for the film's first half-hour. A lot of her mannerisms made me feel not like I was in Ye Olde English Countryside so much as an aggressively self-consciously contemporary feminist revision of it. She does settle into the setting eventually, but for a good 30 minutes I was afraid she and the film would morph into Winona Ryder and 1994's 'Little Women' respectively.
And also, while I'm here - I think I need to watch Fish Tank again to really consider Fassbender's performance. I did find him mesmerising to watch, but I don't know how much of that was because of his actorly choices and how much was because I really urgently wanted to sleep with him. So for now, I have him in my Top 5 supporting turns for "Inglourious Basterds" instead - I have similar reservations about my reaction to that performance, but he gets bonus points for the fact that I didn't even recognise him for a solid 15 minutes of his screentime.
I thought Fairuza Balk's brief contribution to Bad Lieutenant was quite inspired (and she looked so cute in that uniform). I haven't seen her on the big screen in quite some time, and it brought a smile to my face and warm memories of Valmont, Return to Oz and the infamous Frankenheimer version of Dr. Moreau (I almost forgot that Val Kilmer was in that one also - probably an experience all involved would like to forget).
I'm on the fence about whether to see The Young Victoria or not. Right now I'm quite wishy-washy about Blunt; sometimes I like her, other times I'm completely allergic. Rupert Friend looks quite dishy, though.
Your mentioning Whishaw (quite dreamy, also) brought to mind how much I liked him, and also how wonderful Campion is at handling her male actors. Much is always written about the great performances she gets out of her actresses, but I think her track record with actors (like Ruffalo, Keitel and Lycos) is quite excellent, too. I'm especially enamored of Martin Donovan in Portrait. He's an actor I wish we'd see more of, also.
@Bill: Glad to know we share this rainbow connection - wakka wakka wakka!
@Goran: Nice to hear from you! I agree that Cornish gets better the more she settles into the movie, though what Holly Hunter described in the LA Times as a headstrong quality in Cornish's work that still steers clear of "brazenness" is what I liked about it, too. Sounds like you disagree, at least for the first half-hour. As for Fassbender... I am sure I have no idea what you are talking about. Shh!
@CCW: I absolutely agree that Whishaw is at least the equal of Cornish in Bright Star. Tune in tomorrow for more on that subject! I also think that Bad Lieutenant could easily have used more of Balk, whom I'm almost always glad to see. Friend acts his part in The Young Victoria fetchingly well, and having had similar back-and-forth qualms about Blunt in the past, I feel basically okay about her performance. No great shakes, not "period" at all, but better than I had heard. Donovan in Portrait: now that's a performance, not least because it seems modern and period all at the same time.
@Nick: I forgot to mention how envious I am that you got to see The Goddess and on the big screen, at that! That's been on my "must-see-it-if-I-can-ever-find-it" list since seeing Stanley's unforgettable work in Frances many years ago. Your reaction just peaked my interest even more. I've seen only a few minutes of Seance but it looks interesting.
I should mention that Balk was also quite nice in Gas, Food, Lodging, a film that seems all but forgotten today. She was very nicely supported by Brooke Adams as her mother.
And how wonderful and ironic that Paul Schneider has just won the National Society of Film Critics award for best supporting actor, just like Donovan did for Portrait. I agree about the structural problems involving his character, but I think his performance was quite good and it's hard to begrudge any sort of recognition for Bright Star.
I can't believe you're so stringently saving yourself for Seance on a Wet Afternoon! You're leaving something very special for last, then -- as a 12 year-old, I caught the film on TV (South African programmers could be quite imaginative some weekends) and became really rather obsessed with it for a while. Stanley is still my pick for the 1964 Oscar, and that's despite my thinking that Julie Andrews' win is pretty much one of the coolest of all time.
Sorry that you're going quiet again -- but on the positive side, it gives me a chance to catch up on all the very tasty-looking posts that I missed while on holiday. (I've been consciously avoiding your Top 100 list -- with some difficulty, I might add -- until I've finished working on my own.)
P.S. Your mom sounds a thousand kinds of awesome.
P.P.S. Allow me to join the Muppet Army.
So what the hell is this Showplace Icon thing that I have heard exactly nothing about? It's embarrassing to have to read on the internet about a fancy-ass new theater right in my hometown. And the website doesn't explain where it is. Not that I have any desire to spend more than I absolutely must to see anything - especially in January!
Also, I will be referring your very trenchant microcosmic description of the surreal demographic problems of the AMC theatres. Just a couple of days ago I got into an argument about whether it existed or not. Your single paragraph proves it better than all of my huffing and puffing.
I liked the film, but even so, the casual knock against Avatar, "being able to see all the way to the back of a passenger shuttle", made me laugh out loud, or LOL in the gutter argot of the young folks.
Lastly, yay for Muppets!
P.S. Thanks for the altogether generous shout-out to my Jarmusch review.
I'm completely obsessed with Kim Stanley, and I can understand why you took pages of notes on "The Goddess," a failed, strange movie that is nonetheless endlessly interesting, mainly because of her erratic work, which straddles a unique line between fake/technical and vomiting-up, Dreyer-like-dread.
Based on that very helpful "Female Brando" biography that came out a few years ago, Stanley seems like the ultimate example and warning of what the more dubious aspects of the Lee Strasberg acting method can do to you, both professionally and personally.
In "The Goddess," at a certain point, she's just playing tantrum after tantrum, which was her specialty; Anne Jackson said that if she wasn't crying or screaming or whatnot in a role, she felt she wasn't "giving it her all." And that took its toll, finally.
I've tried watching "Seance" twice, but that's less interesting than "The Goddess," if only because her breathy, rather old-fashioned "technique" stuff predominates over her "there ain't no God! I hate my daddy!" firebreathing.
Stanley and Lange on the stairs in "Frances" is classic, of course...and that's probably KS's best film work because it's the most controlled.
Amen on King of the Hill, a movie I have loved since I was fourteen and happened to miraculously stumble upon when it showed on Bravo, of all things, back when reality television didn't exist. This was the same year I saw The 400 Blows as well; suffice it to say, both films mean a great deal to me and are related in my mind for having two of my favorite young protagonists in film. King of the Hill is still Soderbergh's best work, as far as I'm concerned.
And I really thought, based on his incredible and charming performance, that Jesse Bradford was going to be a big deal. Shame that, aside from Bring It On, he hasn't really done much of anything.
Abbie Cornish just ran flat away with my heart in "Bright Star." That's all there is to it. Ben Whishaw was good as was Paul Schneider (one of my favorite character actors), but this movie just ... belonged to Cornish. That she wasn't nominated for Best Actress still makes me mad enough to spit nails.
Post a Comment
<< Home